[fedora-arm] [Fedora 28/aarch64] [nfs/autofs feedback]

[Pierre-Francois RENARD]

Hello guys,

I tried to use autofs and nfs.
I have the same issue with autofs as other guys, with SELinux. I had to change SELinux mode to permissive to be able to make autofs usable ...

But I also discovered that by default mount.nfs and autofs are using NFSv4 and cannot switch to NFSv3.

I had to add an option to /etc/sysconfig/autofs << OPTIONS=" -O vers=3" >> so autofs use by default NFSv3...
Is it a normal behaviour or did I miss something ?

Thanks
Fox
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-***@lists.fed

[Peter Robinson]

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Pierre-Francois RENARD

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
Hello guys,
I tried to use autofs and nfs.
I have the same issue with autofs as other guys, with SELinux. I had to change SELinux mode to permissive to be able to make autofs usable ...

Please report a bug against selinux-policy with the denies included in
the bug report.

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
But I also discovered that by default mount.nfs and autofs are using NFSv4 and cannot switch to NFSv3.

NFSv4 has been the default client side in Fedora for a number of
years. I'm not aware that NFSv3 has been disabled thouygh.

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
I had to add an option to /etc/sysconfig/autofs << OPTIONS=" -O vers=3" >> so autofs use by default NFSv3...
Is it a normal behaviour or did I miss something ?

With NFSv4 being the default that requirement seems fine to me.
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- ***@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an em

[Pierre-Francois Renard]

Post by Peter Robinson
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Pierre-Francois RENARD

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
Hello guys,
I tried to use autofs and nfs.
I have the same issue with autofs as other guys, with SELinux. I had to

change SELinux mode to permissive to be able to make autofs usable ...
Please report a bug against selinux-policy with the denies included in
the bug report.

the bug already exists☺

Post by Peter Robinson

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
But I also discovered that by default mount.nfs and autofs are using

NFSv4 and cannot switch to NFSv3.
NFSv4 has been the default client side in Fedora for a number of
years. I'm not aware that NFSv3 has been disabled thouygh.

it was working with f26/f27 with no tunning at all. probably something new.

Post by Peter Robinson

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
I had to add an option to /etc/sysconfig/autofs << OPTIONS=" -O vers=3"

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
so autofs use by default NFSv3...

Is it a normal behaviour or did I miss something ?

With NFSv4 being the default that requirement seems fine to me.

[Peter Robinson]

Post by Pierre-Francois Renard

Post by Peter Robinson
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Pierre-Francois RENARD

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
Hello guys,
I tried to use autofs and nfs.
I have the same issue with autofs as other guys, with SELinux. I had to

change SELinux mode to permissive to be able to make autofs usable ...
Please report a bug against selinux-policy with the denies included in
the bug report.

the bug already exists☺

Post by Peter Robinson

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
But I also discovered that by default mount.nfs and autofs are using

NFSv4 and cannot switch to NFSv3.
NFSv4 has been the default client side in Fedora for a number of
years. I'm not aware that NFSv3 has been disabled thouygh.

it was working with f26/f27 with no tunning at all. probably something new.

There was a bunch of nfs stuff rebased, file a bug, I suspect it's the same
on x86 too

Post by Pierre-Francois Renard

Post by Peter Robinson

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
I had to add an option to /etc/sysconfig/autofs << OPTIONS=" -O

vers=3" >> so autofs use by default NFSv3...

Post by Pierre-Francois RENARD
Is it a normal behaviour or did I miss something ?

With NFSv4 being the default that requirement seems fine to me.